Hey Luke, as you know, the security stuff hasn't been tested with IBM's JDK. I'll submit a patch for 8251 but I wouldn't block 1.0.3 for this. Thanks Devaraj
On May 15, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > Hey Devaraj, > > Thanks for testing IBM JDK. Can you do the one line fix for IBM JDK as > well for HADOOP-8251, as Todd only fixed Sun JDK. It's not blocker for > 1.0.3. But much easier for you to submit a patch. I already have 14 > patches in the queue waiting for our legal approval. Doing a code scan > for another one line patch would be inefficient :) > > Thanks, > > __Luke > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Devaraj Das <d...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> I downloaded the release, built (non-secure) with IBM's JDK [IBM J9 VM >> (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux amd64-64 jvmxa6460sr10-20111207_96808 >> (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)]. Ran the sleep job successfully on a single node >> cluster. >> >> On May 8, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Matt Foley wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>> release Candidate for Hadoop-1.0.3 is now available for vote, at >>> http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.0.3-rc1/ >>> >>> There are 29 bug fixes and enhancements in this release, including: >>> >>>> 4 patches in support of non-Oracle JDKs >>> >>> several patches to clean up error handling and log messages >>>> various production issues >>>> >>> >>> Please see the Release Notes for the full list, at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.0.3-rc1/releasenotes.html >>> >>> Vote will run the statutory 7 days, and close on Tuesday 15 May, at 6:30pm >>> PDT. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> --Matt >>> Release Manager, Hadoop 1.0 >>
