I agree that we should explore alternatives the forked version of Jetty. This is a longer term goal. In the interim, lets do jetty-6.1.26 + fixes.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Robert Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > I am +1 on this also, although I think we need to look at moving to > Jetty-7 or possibly dropping Jetty completely and look at Netty or even > Tomcat long term. Jetty has just been way too unstable at Hadoop scale > and that has not really changed with newer versions of Jetty. Sticking > with an old forked unsupported version of Jetty longterm seems very risky > too me. > > --Bobby > > On 7/10/12 5:19 PM, "Todd Lipcon" <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > >+1 from me too. We've had this in CDH since Sep '11 and been working > >much better than the stock 6.1.26. > > > >-Todd > > > >On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Graves > >><tgra...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote: > >> > >>> I'm +1 for adding it. > >>> > >> > >> I'm +1 also. > >> > >> -- Owen > > > > > > > >-- > >Todd Lipcon > >Software Engineer, Cloudera > >
