JIRA is opened for this:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8943


-----Original Message-----
From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:17 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; na...@cloudera.com
Subject: RE: Questions and possible improvements for LdapGroupsMapping

Just got reply from user mailing list from Natty, as follows.
And I'd like to discuss further here since it's more appropriate.

Hi Natty,

1. It's great idea that we just write a customized group mapping service to 
handle different mapping for AD user and service principal; 2. OK, I'd like to 
improve it to support multiple ADs; 3. Great to know it. I will try the group 
mapping with OpenLDAP making use of the current configuration properties.

And further, to support to do different mapping for different user/principal, 
and support multiple ADs, we also need extra properties to configure what kind 
of user/principal (regarding domain/realm is an option) should use which group 
mapping mechanism.

To improve such things, I'm going to fire a JIRA for these. It would be great 
if you could continue to  comment on it. 

Thanks & regards,
Kai

From: Jonathan Natkins [mailto:na...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:58 AM
To: u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secure hadoop and group permission on HDFS

Hi Kai,

1. To the best of my knowledge, you can only use one group mapping service at a 
time. In order to do what you're suggesting, you'd have to write a customized 
group mapping service.

2. Currently multiple ADs are not supported, but it's certainly an improvement 
that could be made.

3. The LdapGroupsMapping already supports OpenLDAP. It's pretty heavily 
configurable for the purpose of supporting multiple types of LDAP 
implementations. The defaults just happen to be geared towards Active Directory.

Thanks,
Natty

-----Original Message-----
From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:32 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Questions and possible improvements for LdapGroupsMapping

Hi All,

Regarding LdapGroupsMapping, I have following questions:


1.       Is it possible to use ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping for Hadoop service 
principals/users, and LdapGroupsMapping for end user accounts?
In our  environment, normal end users (along with their groups info) for Hadoop 
cluster are from AD, and for them we prefer to use the ldap mapping; but for 
hdfs/mapred service principals, the default shell based one is enough, and we 
don't want to create the user/group entries in AD just for that.
Seems in current implementation, only one user group mapping provider can be 
configured.


2.       Can we support multiple ADs? Hadoop users might come from more than 
ONE AD in big org.


3.       Is there any technical  issue not to support LDAPs like OpenLDAP? In 
my understanding, one possible difficulity might be that it's not easy to 
extract common
group lookup mechanism with common filters/configurations both applied for AD 
and OpenLDAP like, right?

I'm wondering if these are just limits for current implementation, and if so if 
we need to improve that. Might the community has already been going for that?

Reply via email to