On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Would it better to have 2.0.3-alpha, 2.0.4-beta and then make 2.1 as a > stable release? This way we just have one series (2.0.x) which is not > suitable for general consumption. > > That contains the versioning damage to the 2.0.x set. This is an improvement over the original proposal where we let the versioning mayhem run out 2.3. Thanks Arun, St.Ack
