On Sep 16, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I wanted to broadcast plans for putting the FileSystem symlinks work > (HADOOP-8040) into branch-2.1 for the pending Hadoop 2 GA release. I think > it's pretty important we get it in since it's not a compatible change; if > it misses the GA train, we're not going to have symlinks until the next > major release. Just catching up, is this an incompatible change, or not? The above reads 'not an incompatible change'. Arun > > However, we're still dealing with ongoing issues revealed via testing. > There's user-code out there that only handles files and directories and > will barf when given a symlink (perhaps a dangling one!). See HADOOP-9912 > for a nice example where globStatus returning symlinks broke Pig; some of > us had a conference call to talk it through, and one definite conclusion > was that this wasn't solvable in a generally compatible manner. > > There are also still some gaps in symlink support right now. For example, > the more esoteric FileSystems like WebHDFS, HttpFS, and HFTP need symlink > resolution, and tooling like the FsShell and Distcp still need to be > updated as well. > > So, there's definitely work to be done, but there are a lot of users > interested in the feature, and symlinks really should be in GA. Would > appreciate any thoughts/input on the matter. > > Thanks, > Andrew -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.