Thanks for clarifying that Arpit. I'm a +0.9 since I haven't reviewed
enough to +1, but everything thus far looks great.

Andrew


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Chen He <airb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 nice feature for HDFS
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Our plan as stated back in August was to do this work principally in two
> > phases.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2832?focusedCommentId=13739041
> >
> > For the second phase which includes API support, we also need quota
> > management. For changes of this scope, to do all the work at once while
> > keeping the feature branch in sync with ongoing development in trunk is
> > unmanageable. Hence we'd like to stick with the initial plan and develop
> in
> > phases.
> >
> > Even for datanode caching the initial merge did not include the quota
> > management changes which are happening subsequently.
> >
> > Going forward, we will stabilize the current changes in trunk in the 2.4
> > time frame. Next we will add quota management and API support which can
> > align with the 2.5 time frame, with the second merge potentially in
> > March/April.
> >
> > Arpit
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm still getting up to speed on the changes here (my fault for not
> > > following development more closely, other priorities etc etc), but the
> > > branch thus far is already quite impressive. It's quite an undertaking
> to
> > > turn the DN into a collection of Storages, along with the corresponding
> > > datastructure, tracking, and other changes in the NN and DN.
> > >
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong though, but this still leaves a substantial
> part
> > of
> > > the design doc to be implemented. Looking at the list of remaining
> > > subtasks, it seems like we still can't specify a storage type for a
> file
> > > (HDFS-5229) or write a file to a given storage type (HDFS-5391), along
> > with
> > > the corresponding client protocol changes. This leads me to two
> > questions:
> > >
> > > - If this is merged, what can I do with the new code? Without client
> > > changes or the ability to create a file on a different storage type, I
> > > don't know how (for example) I could hand this to our QA team to test.
> > I'm
> > > wondering why we want to merge now rather than when the branch is more
> > > feature complete.
> > > - What's the plan for the implementation of the remaining features? How
> > > many phases? What's the timeline for these phases? Particularly,
> related
> > to
> > > the use cases presented in section 2 of the design doc.
> > >
> > > I'm also going to post some design doc questions to the JIRA, there
> are a
> > > few technical q's I'd like to get clarification on.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Sirianni, Eric <
> eric.siria...@netapp.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > My team has been developing and testing against the HDFS-2832 branch
> > for
> > > > the past month.  It has proven to be quite stable.
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Arpit Agarwal [mailto:aagar...@hortonworks.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 7:07 PM
> > > > To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous Storage Phase 1 to
> trunk
> > > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to call a vote to merge phase 1 of the Heterogeneous
> > Storage
> > > > feature into trunk.
> > > >
> > > > *Scope of the changes:*
> > > > The changes allow exposing the DataNode as a collection of storages
> and
> > > set
> > > > the foundation for subsequent work to present Heterogeneous Storages
> to
> > > > applications. This allows DataNodes to send block and storage reports
> > > > per-storage. In addition this change introduces the ability to add a
> > > > 'storage type' tag to the storage directories. This enables
> supporting
> > > > different types of storages in addition to disk storage.
> > > >
> > > > Development of the feature is tracked in the jira
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2832.
> > > >
> > > > *Details of development and testing:*
> > > > Development has been done in a separate branch -
> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-2832.
> The
> > > > updated design is posted at -
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12615761/20131125-HeterogeneousStorage.pdf
> > > > .
> > > > The changes involve ~6K changed lines of code, with a third of those
> > > > changes being to tests.
> > > >
> > > > Please see the test plan
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616642/20131202-HeterogeneousStorage-TestPlan.pdffor
> > > > the details. Once the feature is
> > > > merged into trunk, we will continue to test and fix any bugs that may
> > be
> > > > found on trunk as well as add further tests as outlined in the test
> > plan.
> > > >
> > > > The bulk of the design and implementation was done by Suresh
> Srinivas,
> > > > Sanjay Radia, Nicholas Sze, Junping Du and me. Also, thanks to Eric
> > > > Sirianni, Chris Nauroth, Steve Loughran, Bikas Saha, Andrew Wang and
> > Todd
> > > > Lipcon for providing feedback on the Jiras and in discussions.
> > > >
> > > > This vote runs for a week and closes on 12/9/2013 at 11:59 pm PT.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Arpit
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity
> > > to
> > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>

Reply via email to