because it is exposed as classpath dependency, changing it breaks backward
compatibility.


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com>wrote:

> Jetty's a big change, it's fairly intimately involved in bits of the code
>
> but: it's a source of grief, currently webhdfs is an example
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6221
>
> all YARN apps seem to get hosted by it too
>
>
> On 11 April 2014 20:56, Robert Rati <rr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't mean to be dense, but can you expand on why jetty 8 can't go into
> > branch2?  What is the concern?
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > On 04/11/2014 10:55 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> >
> >> if you mean updating jetty on branch2, we cannot do that. it has to be
> >> done in trunk.
> >>
> >> thx
> >>
> >> Alejandro
> >> (phone typing)
> >>
> >>  On Apr 11, 2014, at 4:46, Robert Rati <rr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just an FYI, but I'm working on updating that jetty patch for the
> >>> current 2.4.0 release.  The one that is there won't cleanly apply
> because
> >>> so much has changed since it was posted.  I'll post a new patch when
> it's
> >>> done.
> >>>
> >>> Rob
> >>>
> >>>  On 04/11/2014 04:24 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 10 April 2014 18:12, Eli Collins <e...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let's speak less abstractly, are there particular features or new
> >>>>> dependencies that you would like to contribute (or see contributed)
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> require using the Java 1.7 APIs?  Breaking compat in v2 or rolling a
> v3
> >>>>> release are both non-trivial, not something I suspect we'd want to do
> >>>>> just
> >>>>> because it would be, for example, nicer to have a newer version of
> >>>>> Jetty.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Oddly enough, rolling the web framework is something I'd like to see
> in
> >>>> a
> >>>> v3. the shuffle may be off jetty, but webhdfs isn't. Moving up also
> >>>> lets is
> >>>> reliably switch to servlet API v3
> >>>>
> >>>> But.. I think we may be able to increment Jetty more without going to
> >>>> java7, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9650 .
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>



-- 
Alejandro

Reply via email to