+0 (non-binding) - Downloaded source - Built from source - Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster - Read documents downloaded from binary tarball - Looked Web UIs
I found several issues to be fixed. - HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI "Hadoop, 2014" is old I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop 2.6.0. - HADOOP-11835: "hadoop version" outputs "Subversion Unknown -r Unknown" (Also, there are some "Unknown" version in Web UI) - HADOOP-11836: The content of index.html should be updated for 2.7.0. I'm thinking this two issues are not blocker. Regards, Akira On 4/15/15 11:05, Chris Nauroth wrote:
+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum. - Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows. - Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster. - Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs. - Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a checkpoint. - HADOOP-9629: Tested integration with Azure storage as an alternative FileSystem. - HADOOP-11394/11395/11396: Built site docs and confirmed presence of these fixes in the documentation for Hadoop Compatible File Systems. - HDFS-7604: Confirmed presence of DataNode volume failure reporting in web UI and metrics. - HDFS-7879: Ran nm -g libhdfs.so and dumpbin /exports hdfs.dll to confirm export of public API symbols in libhdfs. Allen mentioned HDFS-8132, which reported a problem using JCarder on the build. Brahma, Todd and I have determined that root cause is incompatibility of the JCarder build with Java 7 classes. (2.7.0 is our first release compiling as Java 7.) This is not a problem that needs to hold up the release. Vinod, thank you for putting together the release. Chris Nauroth Hortonworks http://hortonworks.com/ On 4/15/15, 7:07 AM, "Mit Desai" <[email protected]> wrote:+1 (non-binding) - Downloaded and built the source. - Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and Wordcount. - Verified Signatures - Verified the RM UI for correctness. Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release. -Mit Desai On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <[email protected]> wrote: Tx Pat. This is really interesting news! +Vinod On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White <[email protected]> wrote:+1 non-binding Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good, no regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5% tolerance (dfsio, sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale, compression, shuffle) appear to have improvements. Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while 2.7.0 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0, that said, the 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0. Thanks. patw ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <[email protected]> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0 Hi all, I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0. The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/ The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017 / As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending onhow it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a fewweeks as the stable release. Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days. Thanks, Vinod [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
