Thanks Sangjin for the link to the previous discussions on this! I think
that helps answer Steve's questions.

As decided on that thread [1], YARN-5355 as a feature branch was merged to
trunk via "git merge --no-ff" .

Although trunk already had TSv2 code (alpha1) prior to this merge, we chose
to develop on a feature branch YARN-5355 so that we could control when
changes went into trunk and didn't inadvertently disrupt trunk.

Is the latest merge causing any conflicts or issues for s3guard, Steve?

thanks
Vrushali
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43cd65c6b6c3c0e8ac2b3c76afd9eff1f78b177fabe9c4a96d9b3d0b@1440189889@%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E


On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> wrote:

> I recall this discussion about a couple of years ago:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43cd65c6b6c3c0e8ac2b3c76afd9ef
> f1f78b177fabe9c4a96d9b3d0b@1440189889@%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'd have assumed it would have gone in as one single patch, rather than a
>> full history. I don't see why the trunk needs all the evolutionary history
>> of a build.
>>
>> What should our policy/process be here?
>>
>> I do currently plan to merge the s3guard in as one single squashed patch;
>> just getting HADOOP-14809 sorted first.
>>
>>
>> > On 30 Aug 2017, at 07:09, Vrushali C <vrushalic2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm adding my +1 (binding) to conclude the vote.
>> >
>> > With 13 +1's (11 binding) and no -1's, the vote passes. We'll get on
>> with
>> > the merge to trunk shortly. Thanks everyone!
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Vrushali
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:54 AM, varunsax...@apache.org <
>> > varun.saxena.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 (binding).
>> >>
>> >> Kudos to all the team members for their great work!
>> >>
>> >> Being part of the ATSv2 team, I have been involved with either
>> development
>> >> or review of most of the JIRAs'.
>> >> Tested ATSv2 in both secure and non-secure mode. Also verified that
>> there
>> >> is no impact when ATSv2 is turned off.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Varun Saxena.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Vrushali Channapattan <
>> >> vrushalic2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi folks,
>> >>>
>> >>> Per earlier discussion [1], I'd like to start a formal vote to merge
>> >>> feature branch YARN-5355 [2] (Timeline Service v.2) to trunk. The vote
>> >>> will
>> >>> run for 7 days, and will end August 29 11:00 PM PDT.
>> >>>
>> >>> We have previously completed one merge onto trunk [3] and Timeline
>> Service
>> >>> v2 has been part of Hadoop release 3.0.0-alpha1.
>> >>>
>> >>> Since then, we have been working on extending the capabilities of
>> Timeline
>> >>> Service v2 in a feature branch [2] for a while, and we are reasonably
>> >>> confident that the state of the feature meets the criteria to be
>> merged
>> >>> onto trunk and we'd love folks to get their hands on it in a test
>> capacity
>> >>> and provide valuable feedback so that we can make it production-ready.
>> >>>
>> >>> In a nutshell, Timeline Service v.2 delivers significant scalability
>> and
>> >>> usability improvements based on a new architecture. What we would
>> like to
>> >>> merge to trunk is termed "alpha 2" (milestone 2). The feature has a
>> >>> complete end-to-end read/write flow with security and read level
>> >>> authorization via whitelists. You should be able to start setting it
>> up
>> >>> and
>> >>> testing it.
>> >>>
>> >>> At a high level, the following are the key features that have been
>> >>> implemented since alpha1:
>> >>> - Security via Kerberos Authentication and delegation tokens
>> >>> - Read side simple authorization via whitelist
>> >>> - Client configurable entity sort ordering
>> >>> - Richer REST APIs for apps, app attempts, containers, fetching
>> metrics by
>> >>> timerange, pagination, sub-app entities
>> >>> - Support for storing sub-application entities (entities that exist
>> >>> outside
>> >>> the scope of an application)
>> >>> - Configurable TTLs (time-to-live) for tables, configurable table
>> >>> prefixes,
>> >>> configurable hbase cluster
>> >>> - Flow level aggregations done as dynamic (table level) coprocessors
>> >>> - Uses latest stable HBase release 1.2.6
>> >>>
>> >>> There are a total of 82 subtasks that were completed as part of this
>> >>> effort.
>> >>>
>> >>> We paid close attention to ensure that once disabled Timeline Service
>> v.2
>> >>> does not impact existing functionality when disabled (by default).
>> >>>
>> >>> Special thanks to a team of folks who worked hard and contributed
>> towards
>> >>> this effort with patches, reviews and guidance: Rohith Sharma K S,
>> Varun
>> >>> Saxena, Haibo Chen, Sangjin Lee, Li Lu, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli, Joep
>> >>> Rottinghuis, Jason Lowe, Jian He, Robert Kanter, Micheal Stack.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Vrushali
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg27
>> 383.html
>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5355
>> >>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2928
>> >>> [4] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commits/YARN-5355
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to