Moving the thread to the dev lists. Thanks +Vinod
> On Sep 23, 2019, at 11:43 PM, Vinayakumar B <vinayakum...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks Marton, > > Current created 'hadoop-thirdparty' repo is empty right now. > Whether to use that repo for shaded artifact or not will be monitored in > HADOOP-13363 umbrella jira. Please feel free to join the discussion. > > There is no existing codebase is being moved out of hadoop repo. So I think > right now we are good to go. > > -Vinay > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:38 PM Marton Elek <e...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> I am not sure if it's defined when is a vote required. >> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> Personally I think it's a big enough change to send a notification to the >> dev lists with a 'lazy consensus' closure >> >> Marton >> >> On 2019/09/23 17:46:37, Vinayakumar B <vinayakum...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As discussed in HADOOP-13363, protobuf 3.x jar (and may be more in >> future) >>> will be kept as a shaded artifact in a separate repo, which will be >>> referred as dependency in hadoop modules. This approach avoids shading >> of >>> every submodule during build. >>> >>> So question is does any VOTE required before asking to create a git repo? >>> >>> On selfserve platform https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html >>> I can access see that, requester should be PMC. >>> >>> Wanted to confirm here first. >>> >>> -Vinay >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@hadoop.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
