Thanks Chao for your great work and thanks Viraj's careful checks here.
After checking to build from source and setting up a pseudo cluster based
on the
RC4, it seems that it is almost ready for release-3.3.2 beside update
changelog, right?
Please feel free to share information if you meet any blocker issues to
push this release
progress forward.
Thanks Chao again.

Best,
- He Xiaoqiao

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:43 PM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Chao, things look good with the Jira fixVersion discrepancies.
> I am curious if this requires new RC or you would like to update Changelog
> in the existing RC. Either way, once Changelog is updated, and since other
> functional testing looks good anyways, my vote would be +1 (non-binding).
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 11:27 PM, Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks again Viraj!
> >
> > > 1. Incorrect fix versions: HADOOP-17988, HADOOP-17728
> >
> > I fixed HADOOP-17988. HADOOP-17728 is resolved as invalid so I removed
> the
> > fix version tag.
> >
> > 2. HADOOP-17873 is not yet resolved but the corresponding commit is
> > present.
> >
> > Removed the fix version tag for this too.
> >
> > > 3. Resolved with 3.3.2 fixversion but no no corresponding commit found
> > on 3.3.2: HADOOP-17936, HADOOP-18066
> >
> > I think HADOOP-17936 is already in branch-3.3.2?
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commit/6931b70a004de2c84b0630bdb92a2c9f62879c24
> > HADOOP-18066 is resolved as invalid so I just removed the fix version
> tag.
> >
> > Please check again when you have a chance. Thanks.
> >
> > Best,
> > Chao
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:51 PM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Chao. I just re-executed the script and found very minor
> >> differences:
> >>
> >> 1. Incorrect fix versions:
> >> HADOOP-17988
> >> HADOOP-17728
> >>
> >> 2. HADOOP-17873 is not yet resolved but the corresponding commit is
> >> present.
> >>
> >> 3. Resolved with 3.3.2 fixversion but no no corresponding commit found
> on
> >> 3.3.2:
> >> HADOOP-17936
> >> HADOOP-18066
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thank you so much Viraj! I've no idea that I missed tagging these many
> >>> JIRAs. The script is super useful!
> >>>
> >>> I just fixed the "fix version" of these. Could you double check? Really
> >>> appreciate you putting effort to do a thorough check on this.
> >>>
> >>> Chao
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:10 AM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -0 (non-binding), due to git/jira version discrepancies. Once resolved
> >>>> and
> >>>> changelist updated, will change my vote to +1 (non-binding).
> >>>>
> >>>> Basic RC verification using hadoop-vote.sh
> >>>> <
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/dev-support/hadoop-vote.sh
> >>>> >:
> >>>>
> >>>>         * Signature: ok
> >>>>         * Checksum : ok
> >>>>         * Rat check (1.8.0_301): ok
> >>>>          - mvn clean apache-rat:check
> >>>>         * Built from source (1.8.0_301): ok
> >>>>          - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
> >>>>         * Built tar from source (1.8.0_301): ok
> >>>>          - mvn clean package  -Pdist -DskipTests -Dtar
> >>>> -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true
> >>>>
> >>>> Functional validation of HDFS, MapReduce and ATSv2 carry-forwarded
> from
> >>>> previous RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Found some Git/Jira version discrepancies (script used from PR
> >>>> <https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3991>):
> >>>>
> >>>> Jiras with missing fixVersion: 3.3.2
> >>>>
> >>>> HADOOP-17198
> >>>> HDFS-16344
> >>>> HDFS-16339
> >>>> YARN-11007
> >>>> HDFS-16171
> >>>> HDFS-16350
> >>>> HDFS-16336
> >>>> HADOOP-17975
> >>>> YARN-10991
> >>>> HDFS-16332
> >>>> HADOOP-17857
> >>>> HDFS-16271
> >>>> HADOOP-17195
> >>>> HADOOP-17290
> >>>> HADOOP-17819
> >>>> YARN-9551
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:10 AM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Thanks Chao. Yes contents are now present, I will start the testing.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 2:13 AM, Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Oops, sorry about that. They should be there now. Can you check
> >>>> again?
> >>>> >> Thanks!
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Chao
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 6:47 AM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> > The RC is available at:
> >>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~sunchao/hadoop-3.3.2-RC4/
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Chao, the RC folder seems empty as of now.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 3:12 AM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Sorry for the delay! was waiting for a few fixes that people have
> >>>> >>>> requested
> >>>> >>>> to backport. I've just put together Hadoop 3.3.2 RC4 below:
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~sunchao/hadoop-3.3.2-RC4/
> >>>> >>>> The RC tag is at:
> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/releases/tag/release-3.3.2-RC4
> >>>> >>>> The Maven artifacts are staged at:
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1334/
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> You can find my public key at:
> >>>> >>>> https://downloads.apache.org/hadoop/common/KEYS
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> The deltas between this and RC3 are the addition of the following
> >>>> fixes:
> >>>> >>>>   - HADOOP-17198. Support S3 Access Points
> >>>> >>>>   - HADOOP-18096. Distcp: Sync moves filtered file to home
> >>>> directory
> >>>> >>>> rather
> >>>> >>>> than deleting.
> >>>> >>>>   - YARN-10561. Upgrade node.js to 12.22.1 and yarn to 1.22.5 in
> >>>> YARN
> >>>> >>>> application catalog webapp
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Same as before, I've done the following verification and they
> look
> >>>> good:
> >>>> >>>> - Ran all the unit tests
> >>>> >>>> - Started a single node HDFS cluster and tested a few simple
> >>>> commands
> >>>> >>>> - Ran all the tests in Spark using the RC4 artifacts
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Please evaluate the RC and vote, thanks!
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Best,
> >>>> >>>> Chao
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to