Thanks for the quick response.
No worries at all, it just made our scripts fail on the checksum.

So, yeah. It'd be great if - in the future - the "correct" checksum
files were to be used instead.

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 4:48 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi that's a good catch
> The RC1 was used for official release, and instead of using the build
> script to create an entirely new release tarball I simply updated the file
> names.
> Probably shouldn't do so.
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 6:00 AM Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the checksum file for the 3.3.6 release references the 3.3.6-rc1 file
> > which makes it harder to compare.
> >
> >
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-3.3.6/hadoop-3.3.6.tar.gz.sha512
> >
> > contains
> >
> > SHA512 (hadoop-3.3.6-RC1.tar.gz) =
> >
> > de3eaca2e0517e4b569a88b63c89fae19cb8ac6c01ff990f1ff8f0cc0f3128c8e8a23db01577ca562a0e0bb1b4a3889f8c74384e609cd55e537aada3dcaa9f8a
> >
> > The checksum itself is correct.
> > I would have thought that this happens automatically but there seems
> > to be a manual step involved somewhere?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lars
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to