+1 for closing stale PRs. Thanks, Dinesh
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025, 3:14 AM Xiaoqiao He <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I try to launch this thread again, and propose to close stale PRs at Github > which was updated over 100 days ago. > > There are 1180 open PRs at Github[1], which is unfriendly for reviewers or > someone who wants to be involved to review here. > > I see that we have discussed many times, including [2],[3], but there are > no more concrete follow-ups or conclusions. And there are many Apache > projects have been adopted this way for years such as Apache Spark[4], > So IMO, there will be no more blockers now. > > One thing left I didn't think it through, the related JIRA should keep > synchronized to close? Look forward to hearing more thoughts. > BTW, I think related JIRA close or not should be another thing and > it doesn't block Github Action for stale PRs. > Thanks all. > > Best Regards, > - He Xiaoqiao > > [1] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pulls > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fdnj065koh7cjgxbk4jxthlpycmo4tm7 > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6g3n4wo3b3tpq2qxyyth3y8m9z4mcj8p > [4] > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/.github/workflows/stale.yml >
