[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12866582#action_12866582
 ] 

Edward Capriolo commented on HADOOP-5670:
-----------------------------------------

Jeff the implementation I want to go for was described above:

I suppose if all we wish is to replace basically the -D options passed into 
hadoop, then I am very openminded to a ldap based scheme as a plugin. I would 
be very happy if it included some scoping so that configuration could be 
provided on a intra cluster, inter cluster, host ,user or job level. Guidelines 
should be provided as how not to disrupt existing ldap users.

And meet this requirement:

I think we don't need to debate hard on ldap versus zookeeper versus etc on 
this specific issue. I assume that we would have the abstraction here so that 
folks can try out different systems - ldap, zookeeper etc. and can configure 
one as per their environment needs.

Also I wanted to add that since the new hadoop security is kerberos. Kerberos 
is normally backended by LDAP, so a good point of users will have an ldap 
server at their disposal.

> Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5670
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: conf
>            Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>
> Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, 
> compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information 
> (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to