[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12889494#action_12889494
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-6834:
--------------------------------

Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #395 (See 
[http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/395/])
    HADOOP-6834. TFile.append compares initial key against null lastKey (hong 
tang via mahadev)


> TFile.append compares initial key against null lastKey  
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6834
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6834
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2
>            Reporter: Ahad Rana
>            Assignee: Hong Tang
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: hadoop-6834-20100715.patch
>
>
> The following code in TFile.KeyReigster.close: 
>             byte[] lastKey = lastKeyBufferOS.getBuffer();
>             int lastLen = lastKeyBufferOS.size();
>             if (tfileMeta.getComparator().compare(key, 0, len, lastKey, 0,
>                 lastLen) < 0) {
>               throw new IOException("Keys are not added in sorted order");
>             }
> compares the initial  key (passed in via  TFile.Writer.append) against a 
> technically NULL lastKey. lastKey is not initialized until after the first 
> call to TFile.Writer.append. The underlying RawComparator interface used for 
> comparisons does not stipulate the proper behavior when either length 1  or 
> length 2 is zero. In the case of LongWritable, its WritableComparator 
> implementation does an unsafe read on the passed in byte arrays b1 and b2. 
> Since TFile pre-allocates the buffer used for storing lastKey, this passes a 
> valid buffer with zero count to LongWritable's comparator, which ignores 
> length and thus produces incorrect results. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to