[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15145887#comment-15145887
 ] 

Junping Du commented on HADOOP-12794:
-------------------------------------

Thanks [~rmutyala] for contributing the patch. 
The patch looks good in overall. However, it could be better to add unit test 
for some of added compress levels in {{TestZlibCompressorDecompressor}} (a good 
example could be: testCompressorDecompressorWithExeedBufferLimit()). 
Also, for name of some CompressionLevel, like 6, shall we follow existing 
naming practice to name it as BEST_BALANCE for balance between compression 
ratio and speed?
Last but not the least, it seems like some checkstyle issues (missing dot for 
first line) that should be easily fixed. 

> Support additional compression levels for GzipCodec
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-12794
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12794
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.2
>            Reporter: Ravi Mutyala
>            Assignee: Ravi Mutyala
>             Fix For: 2.7.3
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-12794.0001.patch
>
>
> gzip supports compression levels 1-9. Compression level 4 seems to give best 
> compression per CPU time in some of our tests. Right now ZlibCompressor that 
> is used by GzipCodec only supports levels 1,9 and six (default). 
> Adding all the compression levels that are supported by native ZlibCompressor
> can provide more options to tweak compression levels. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to