[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903195#action_12903195
 ] 

Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6833:
-------------------------------------

+1    

Here are the test-patch results. Not sure why it -1 javadoc, ant 
javadoc|javadoc-dev are clean.

{noformat}
     [exec] -1 overall.  
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     -1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new 
or modified tests.
     [exec]                         Please justify why no new tests are needed 
for this patch.
     [exec]                         Also please list what manual steps were 
performed to verify this patch.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     -1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 
warning messages.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number 
of javac compiler warnings.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
warnings.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of release audit warnings.
{noformat}


> IPC leaks call parameters when exceptions thrown
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6833
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6833
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.22.0
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: hadoop-6833.txt, hadoop-6833.txt
>
>
> HADOOP-6498 moved the calls.remove() call lower into the SUCCESS clause of 
> receiveResponse(), but didn't put a similar calls.remove into the ERROR 
> clause. So, any RPC call that throws an exception ends up orphaning the Call 
> object in the connection's "calls" hashtable. This prevents cleanup of the 
> connection and is a memory leak for the call parameters.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to