[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15299017#comment-15299017
]
Xiao Chen commented on HADOOP-12893:
------------------------------------
Hi [~ozawa],
Thanks again for helping out. Were you able to try the patch?
I should have mentioned that the current jdiff scope {{provided}} doesn't
bundle it into the jars. Making the scope of jdiff to "compile" does make it
show up though, so I didn't include that change in the latest patch. Is it okay
to have it in our deps, but not bundled? (That is, the as-is option in my above
[comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12893?focusedCommentId=15295903&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15295903])
> Verify LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12893
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12893
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.7.3, 2.6.5, 3.0.0-alpha1
> Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
> Assignee: Xiao Chen
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12893.002.patch, HADOOP-12893.003.patch,
> HADOOP-12893.004.patch, HADOOP-12893.005.patch, HADOOP-12893.01.patch
>
>
> We have many bundled dependencies in both the source and the binary artifacts
> that are not in LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
