[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15371141#comment-15371141
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-13344:
-------------------------------------------
Reading http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html, I'm inclined to think we're doing this
wrong in Hadoop. (Like that never happens...)
Maybe we should pull the binding out, put it in a separate dir, then use a var
to pull that dir in. I suspect that will break compatibility in 2.x though.
(Although if hdfs-client can go in with it's insanity, this isn't much worse.)
> Add option to exclude Hadoop's SLF4J binding
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13344
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: bin, scripts
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.7.2
> Reporter: Thomas Poepping
> Labels: patch
> Attachments: HADOOP-13344.patch
>
>
> If another application that uses the Hadoop classpath brings in its own SLF4J
> binding for logging, and that jar is not the exact same as the one brought in
> by Hadoop, then there will be a conflict between logging jars between the two
> classpaths. This patch introduces an optional setting to remove Hadoop's
> SLF4J binding from the classpath, to get rid of this problem.
> This patch should be applied to 2.8.0, as bin/ and hadoop-config.sh structure
> has been changed in 3.0.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
