[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Mackrory updated HADOOP-13494:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: HADOOP-13494.001.patch
Attaching a patch with a simple approach. It'd be nice to have some mechanism
where modules that define config parameters (e.g. Constants.java under s3a) can
say which ones are sensitive. But that seems a recipe for over-engineering to
me... I think a list of patterns will be best. Any suggestions of other
patterns that belong on the list would be welcome...
> ReconfigurableBase can log sensitive information
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13494
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sean Mackrory
> Assignee: Sean Mackrory
> Attachments: HADOOP-13494.001.patch
>
>
> ReconfigurableBase will log old and new configuration values, which may cause
> sensitive parameters (most notably cloud storage keys, though there may be
> other instances) to get included in the logs.
> Given the currently small list of reconfigurable properties, an argument
> could be made for simply not logging the property values at all, but this is
> not the only instance where potentially sensitive configuration gets written
> somewhere else in plaintext. I think a generic mechanism for redacting
> sensitive information for textual display will be useful to some of the web
> UIs too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
