[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15512833#comment-15512833 ]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-13622: ----------------------------------------- no, no timetable. What would be good would be some special section in {{hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/site/markdown/FileSystemShell.md}} on "fs shell commands and object stores" * why you can get not found exceptions on an {{-fs ls s3a://bucket }} URL if you leave off the trailing / (it's because there's no homedir, and the shell assumes its a relative path) * distcp atomic not working * why you should use {{fs -put -d}} to upload files without the rename * why you should use {{-skipTrash}} when deleting things * why you shouldn't put secrets in the URLs, e.g. s3n://awsId:secret@mybucket/ Looks also like the document doesn't even mention put's -d and -f options, so it could do with a quick comparison of what usage info gets printed in a {{hadoop fs}} message and what the docs say, updating the docs. Would you be willing to do this? > `-atomic` should not be supported while using `distcp` command in object file > system > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-13622 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13622 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Yuanbo Liu > Assignee: Yuanbo Liu > > After discussing with [~ste...@apache.org] in HADOOP-13593, I get the point > that none of the object stores support atomic renames. So I file a new jira > and ready to provide a patch to disable `distcp -atomic` in object file > system. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org