[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12964949#action_12964949
 ] 

Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6904:
--------------------------------------

Hairong, the latest patch seems like it could be reasonable, but it lacks 
context for me to evalutate it.  Perhaps you could also update HDFS-1335 or 
maybe provide a test case that defines two versions of a simple protocol and 
shows how this would be used to adapt them?

I like the idea that Sanjay presents of permitting protocol introspection on 
the client and server.  That would better integrate with Avro, should we ever 
decide to switch to that.

> A baby step towards inter-version communications between dfs client and 
> NameNode
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: ipc
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: Hairong Kuang
>            Assignee: Hairong Kuang
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: majorMinorVersion.patch, majorMinorVersion1.patch, 
> rpcVersion.patch, rpcVersion1.patch
>
>
> Currently RPC communications in Hadoop is very strict. If a client has a 
> different version from that of the server, a VersionMismatched exception is 
> thrown and the client can not connect to the server. This force us to update 
> both client and server all at once if a RPC protocol is changed. But sometime 
> different versions do not mean the client & server are not compatible. It 
> would be nice if we could relax this restriction and allows us to support 
> inter-version communications.
> My idea is that DfsClient catches VersionMismatched exception when it 
> connects to NameNode. It then checks if the client & the server is 
> compatible. If yes, it sets the NameNode version in the dfs client and allows 
> the client to continue talking to NameNode. Otherwise, rethrow the 
> VersionMismatch exception.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to