[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12964962#action_12964962
 ] 

Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6685:
---------------------------------------

Doug> I'll try to be clearer. As I understand the veto, you and Tom object to 
three points:
# Format of the serialized metadata, specifically you both prefer 
JSON/stringly-typed data to protocol buffers
# Packaging, in particular adding protocol buffers and thrift
# Changing SequenceFile, an experimental format packaged with Hadoop

I'm suggesting that this issue focus on (1) exclusively. If we reach consensus 
on this point, then we can commit a patch and address (2) and (3) elsewhere. 
There is agreement on the domain of (1), so a technical debate may follow. In 
contrast, (2) and (3) can be deferred, as (2) is part of a larger failing and 
(3) can be addressed after the patch is committed. While (1) admits coherent 
arguments, (2-3) have been fought by indignation. As a tactic for consensus, it 
seems reasonable to stop arguing project policy proxied through this patch and 
focus on the item admitting technical, falsifiable claims.

> Change the generic serialization framework API to use serialization-specific 
> bytes instead of Map<String,String> for configuration
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6685
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>            Assignee: Owen O'Malley
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: libthrift.jar, serial.patch, serial4.patch, 
> serial6.patch, serial7.patch, SerializationAtSummit.pdf
>
>
> Currently, the generic serialization framework uses Map<String,String> for 
> the serialization specific configuration. Since this data is really internal 
> to the specific serialization, I think we should change it to be an opaque 
> binary blob. This will simplify the interface for defining specific 
> serializations for different contexts (MAPREDUCE-1462). It will also move us 
> toward having serialized objects for Mappers, Reducers, etc (MAPREDUCE-1183).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to