[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15527649#comment-15527649
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HADOOP-12756:
----------------------------------------
To clarify, I don't object to the content of the change (I haven't looked into
it). This change is likely safe because it doesn't affect existing code. But
letting committers override the branch merge procedure selectively is opening a
can of worms.
> Incorporate Aliyun OSS file system implementation
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12756
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12756
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: HADOOP-12756
> Reporter: shimingfei
> Assignee: shimingfei
> Fix For: HADOOP-12756
>
> Attachments: Aliyun-OSS-integration-v2.pdf,
> Aliyun-OSS-integration.pdf, HADOOP-12756-v02.patch, HADOOP-12756.003.patch,
> HADOOP-12756.004.patch, HADOOP-12756.005.patch, HADOOP-12756.006.patch,
> HADOOP-12756.007.patch, HADOOP-12756.008.patch, HADOOP-12756.009.patch,
> HADOOP-12756.010.patch, HCFS User manual.md, OSS integration.pdf
>
>
> Aliyun OSS is widely used among China’s cloud users, but currently it is not
> easy to access data laid on OSS storage from user’s Hadoop/Spark application,
> because of no original support for OSS in Hadoop.
> This work aims to integrate Aliyun OSS with Hadoop. By simple configuration,
> Spark/Hadoop applications can read/write data from OSS without any code
> change. Narrowing the gap between user’s APP and data storage, like what have
> been done for S3 in Hadoop
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
