[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15702893#comment-15702893
]
Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-13597:
--------------------------------------
Hi John, could you respond to my earlier question about if this change is
incompatible? If so, this is a blocker for 3.0.0-beta1, and we should mark it
as such.
bq. since MiniKMS is also based on embedded Jetty, it is possible to replace it
with full KMS once KMS is switched to embedded Jetty?
Seems fine to me.
> Switch KMS from Tomcat to Jetty
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13597
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13597
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: kms
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: John Zhuge
> Assignee: John Zhuge
>
> The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are
> other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the
> following reasons:
> * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet
> Containers}}, so we don't have change client code that much. It would require
> more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}.
> * Well established.
> * Good performance and scalability.
> Other alternatives:
> * Jersey + Grizzly
> * Tomcat 8
> Your opinions will be greatly appreciated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
