[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15733571#comment-15733571
]
John Zhuge commented on HADOOP-13597:
-------------------------------------
[~aw] I tries to preserve exactly the same behavior as the existing
{{hadoop_deprecate_envvar}} when {{newvar}} is not empty. Isn't {{-z}} the
reverse of {{-n}}? Did I miss something?
The current code:
{code}
function hadoop_deprecate_envvar
{
local oldvar=$1
local newvar=$2
local oldval=${!oldvar}
local newval=${!newvar}
if [[ -n "${oldval}" ]]; then <<<<<<<====
hadoop_error "WARNING: ${oldvar} has been replaced by ${newvar}. Using
value of ${oldvar}."
# shellcheck disable=SC2086
eval ${newvar}=\"${oldval}\"
# shellcheck disable=SC2086
newval=${oldval}
# shellcheck disable=SC2086
eval ${newvar}=\"${newval}\"
fi
}
{code}
> Switch KMS from Tomcat to Jetty
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13597
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13597
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: kms
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: John Zhuge
> Assignee: John Zhuge
> Attachments: HADOOP-13597.001.patch, HADOOP-13597.002.patch,
> HADOOP-13597.003.patch
>
>
> The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are
> other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the
> following reasons:
> * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet
> Containers}}, so we don't have change client code that much. It would require
> more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}.
> * Well established.
> * Good performance and scalability.
> Other alternatives:
> * Jersey + Grizzly
> * Tomcat 8
> Your opinions will be greatly appreciated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
