[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826802#comment-15826802
]
Sean Mackrory commented on HADOOP-13660:
----------------------------------------
I don't recall but I just took a quick look. I'll bet what happened is I ran
into the convergence issue in Azure (because as you said, that comes up if you
remove the exclusion), and I excluded it and meant to go back and
version-manage that more properly once everything else was working.
All tests pass for me now, and would have back then, but that's as close as I
get to being confident that all azure storage codepaths are valid without that
dependency. I'd be all for properly declaring the version we depend on in the
hadoop-project pom as you're suggesting...
> Upgrade commons-configuration version to 2.1
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13660
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13660
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
> Reporter: Sean Mackrory
> Assignee: Sean Mackrory
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha2
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-13660.001.patch, HADOOP-13660.002.patch,
> HADOOP-13660.003.patch, HADOOP-13660.004.patch, HADOOP-13660.005.patch,
> HADOOP-13660.006.patch, HADOOP-13660.007.patch,
> HADOOP-13660-configuration2.001.patch
>
>
> We're currently pulling in version 1.6 - I think we should upgrade to the
> latest 1.10.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
