[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15938217#comment-15938217
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-11794:
-----------------------------------------
I like the direction here. I undertstand while a fail-fast is good: otherwise
it's the workers failing and the problem with reporting.That's something to
consider later. For now: Caller had better know about the destination.
Looking forward to seeing this in, and thanks to everyone engaged in testing it
Omkar: if ADL doesn't implement the distcp contract test, you might want to
follow up this patch with a distcp test that forces the use of the concat
operation.
> distcp can copy blocks in parallel
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11794
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tools/distcp
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: Yongjun Zhang
> Attachments: HADOOP-11794.001.patch, HADOOP-11794.002.patch,
> HADOOP-11794.003.patch, HADOOP-11794.004.patch, HADOOP-11794.005.patch,
> HADOOP-11794.006.patch, HADOOP-11794.007.patch, HADOOP-11794.008.patch,
> HADOOP-11794.009.patch, MAPREDUCE-2257.patch
>
>
> The minimum unit of work for a distcp task is a file. We have files that are
> greater than 1 TB with a block size of 1 GB. If we use distcp to copy these
> files, the tasks either take a long long long time or finally fails. A better
> way for distcp would be to copy all the source blocks in parallel, and then
> stich the blocks back to files at the destination via the HDFS Concat API
> (HDFS-222)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
