[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15958318#comment-15958318
]
Tsuyoshi Ozawa commented on HADOOP-13363:
-----------------------------------------
[~andrew.wang] I thought this should be in alpha3, personally. After discussion
on ML, we confirmed that proto2 syntax is compatible with protobuf spec v2. We
have enough confidence to update protobuf version, I think.
{quote}
Would it make sense having a shaded-3rdparty-libs jar that had relocated
protobuf and other libs we want to shade?
{quote}
It makes sense to me, but IIUC, this is one kind of optimization to reduce jar
size. IMHO, we can make this change later. What do you think?
> Upgrade protobuf from 2.5.0 to something newer
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2
> Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-13363.001.patch, HADOOP-13363.002.patch,
> HADOOP-13363.003.patch, HADOOP-13363.004.patch, HADOOP-13363.005.patch
>
>
> Standard protobuf 2.5.0 does not work properly on many platforms. (See, for
> example, https://gist.github.com/BennettSmith/7111094 ). In order for us to
> avoid crazy work arounds in the build environment and the fact that 2.5.0 is
> starting to slowly disappear as a standard install-able package for even
> Linux/x86, we need to either upgrade or self bundle or something else.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
