[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055963#comment-16055963
 ] 

Xiao Chen commented on HADOOP-14521:
------------------------------------

bq. pre-commit
I tried to ran {{TestAclsEndToEnd}} before and after applying this patch on 
branch-2.8. It was passing before, failing after. Could you try the same? 
Perhaps something odd happening on my local. (I didn't look inside except for 
running the tests)

bq. I don't fully understand your comment.
Your patch is cool, just the tool was confused due to the naming. 
{{smart-apply-patch}} uses the wiki's naming convention to choose patch for 
trunk, branch-2, branch-2.8 etc. I was saying running 
{{dev-support/bin/smart-apply-patch HADOOP-14521}} was trying to apply the 
branch-2.8 patch when running on trunk:
{quote}
$ ./dev-support/bin/smart-apply-patch HADOOP-14521
Processing: HADOOP-14521
HADOOP-14521 patch is being downloaded at Tue Jun 20 08:31:28 PDT 2017 from
  
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12873350/HDFS-11804-branch-2.8.patch
 -> Downloaded
ERROR: Aborting! HADOOP-14521 cannot be verified.
{quote}
Maybe we can improve yetus on that since as you said, pre-commit ran fine.

> KMS client needs retry logic
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14521
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14521
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Rushabh S Shah
>            Assignee: Rushabh S Shah
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14521.09.patch, HDFS-11804-branch-2.8.patch, 
> HDFS-11804-trunk-1.patch, HDFS-11804-trunk-2.patch, HDFS-11804-trunk-3.patch, 
> HDFS-11804-trunk-4.patch, HDFS-11804-trunk-5.patch, HDFS-11804-trunk-6.patch, 
> HDFS-11804-trunk-7.patch, HDFS-11804-trunk-8.patch, HDFS-11804-trunk.patch
>
>
> The kms client appears to have no retry logic – at all.  It's completely 
> decoupled from the ipc retry logic.  This has major impacts if the KMS is 
> unreachable for any reason, including but not limited to network connection 
> issues, timeouts, the +restart during an upgrade+.
> This has some major ramifications:
> # Jobs may fail to submit, although oozie resubmit logic should mask it
> # Non-oozie launchers may experience higher rates if they do not already have 
> retry logic.
> # Tasks reading EZ files will fail, probably be masked by framework reattempts
> # EZ file creation fails after creating a 0-length file – client receives 
> EDEK in the create response, then fails when decrypting the EDEK
> # Bulk hadoop fs copies, and maybe distcp, will prematurely fail



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to