[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16108041#comment-16108041
]
Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-11790:
--------------------------------------
Can this be targeted at a future 3.x release, or does it need to be in beta?
What is our best guess at how long it would take to migrate to RocksDB?
My guess is that this is backwards compatible and would be more than 1.5 months
of work (how far we are from the mid-Sept target release date), so I don't want
to hold the beta1 release for this. I can add a 3.0.0 fix version if you'd like
to retarget this at GA, or we can lower the priority.
> leveldb usage should be disabled by default or smarter about platforms
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11790
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11790
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0, 3.0.0-alpha3
> Environment: * any non-x86
> * any OS that isn't Linux, OSX, Windows
> Reporter: Ayappan
> Priority: Blocker
>
> The leveldbjni artifact in maven repository has been built for only x86
> architecture. Due to which some of the testcases are failing in PowerPC. The
> leveldbjni community has no plans to support other platforms [
> https://github.com/fusesource/leveldbjni/issues/54 ]. Right now , the
> approach is we need to locally built leveldbjni prior to running hadoop
> testcases. Pushing a PowerPC-specific leveldbjni artifact in central maven
> repository and making pom.xml to pickup it up while running in PowerPC is
> another option but i don't know whether this is a suitable one . Any other
> alternative/solution is there ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
