[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16556752#comment-16556752
]
Sean Mackrory commented on HADOOP-14507:
----------------------------------------
In HADOOP-15632 I'm proposing we restore the CredentialProvider constructors
from before and simply don't support per-bucket configs through them unless you
use the new constructors, FYI.
> extend per-bucket secret key config with explicit getPassword() on
> fs.s3a.$bucket.secret.key
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14507
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14507
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: fs/s3
> Affects Versions: 2.8.1
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.1.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-14507-001.patch, HADOOP-14507-002.patch,
> HADOOP-14507-003.patch, HADOOP-14507-004.patch, HADOOP-14507-005.patch,
> HADOOP-14507-006.patch, HADOOP-14507-006.patch, HADOOP-14507-007.patch,
> HADOOP-14507-008.patch
>
>
> Per-bucket jceks support turns out to be complex as you have to manage
> multiple jecks files & configure the client to ask for the right one. This is
> because we're calling {{Configuration.getPassword{"fs,s3a.secret.key"}}.
> If before that, we do a check for the explict id, key, session key in the
> properties {{fs.s3a.$bucket.secret}} ( & c), we could have a single JCEKs
> file with all the secrets for different bucket. You would only need to
> explicitly point the base config to the secrets file, and the right
> credentials would be picked up, if set
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
