[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16612550#comment-16612550
]
Da Zhou commented on HADOOP-15694:
----------------------------------
+1 from my side, the changes doesn't affect the interface which looks good to
me, and the new tests addressed the feedback above.
I'm running mvn tests locally, just in case if any thing is broken...
> ABFS: Allow OAuth credentials to not be tied to accounts
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-15694
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15694
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sean Mackrory
> Assignee: Sean Mackrory
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15694-HADOOP-15407-005.patch,
> HADOOP-15694-HADOOP-15407.003.patch, HADOOP-15694-HADOOP-15407.004.patch,
> HADOOP-15694-HADOOP-15407.006.patch, HADOOP-15694-HADOOP-15407.007.patch,
> HADOOP-15694.001.patch, HADOOP-15694.002.patch, HADOOP-15694.003.patch
>
>
> Now that there's OAuth support, it's possible to have a notion of identity
> that's distinct from the account itself. If a cluster is configured via OAuth
> with it's own identity, it's likely operators will want to use that identity
> regardless of which storage account a job uses.
> So OAuth configs right now (and probably others) are looked up with
> <config_key>.<account>. I propose that we add a function for looking up these
> configs that returns an account-specific value if it exists, but in the event
> it does not will also try to return <config_key>, if that exists.
> I can work on a patch for this if nobody has any objections.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
