[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16742334#comment-16742334
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-15843:
-----------------------------------------
bq. Tested on ireland. Got timeout on
org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.s3guard.ITestDynamoDBMetadataStore:testProvisionTable
(unrelated?).
I'd missed that test: looks like its doomed once it's been invoked enough times
that day for changing capacity to fail. See HADOOP-15426's change to
testDynamoDBInitDestroyCycle for similar. How about you file a JIRA to cut that
test, because we've moved beyond it and it can only cause trouble.
> s3guard bucket-info command to not print a stack trace on bucket-not-found
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-15843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15843
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: fs/s3
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Adam Antal
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HADOOP-15843-001.patch, HADOOP-15843.002.patch
>
>
> when you go {{hadoop s3guard bucket-info s3a://bucket-which-doesnt-exist}}
> you get a full stack trace on the failure. This is overkill: all the caller
> needs to know is the bucket isn't there.
> Proposed: catch FNFE and treat as special, have return code of "44", "not
> found".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
