[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17202752#comment-17202752 ]
Jinglun commented on HADOOP-17280: ---------------------------------- Hi [~hexiaoqiao] [~tasanuma], could you help reviewing this, thanks very much ! > Service-user cost shouldn't be accumulated to totalDecayedCallCost and > totalRawCallCost. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-17280 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17280 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jinglun > Assignee: Jinglun > Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-17280.001.patch, HADOOP-17280.002.patch, > HADOOP-17280.003.patch, HADOOP-17280.004.patch > > > HADOOP-17165 has introduced a very useful feature: service-user. After this > feature I think we shouldn't add the service-user's cost into > totalDecayedCallCost and totalRawCallCost anymore. Because it may give all > the identities the priority 0(Supposing we have a big service-user). -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org