[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17330029#comment-17330029 ]
Viraj Jasani edited comment on HADOOP-17409 at 4/23/21, 6:52 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------------- [~ste...@apache.org] Is your proposal to remove S3Guard applicable to 3.4.0 onwards or is it for next major release (4.0.0) onwards? Thanks was (Author: vjasani): [~ste...@apache.org] Is your intention to remove S3Guard applicable to 3.4.0 onwards or is it for next major release (4.0.0) onwards? > Remove S3Guard - no longer needed > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-17409 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17409 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 3.3.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Priority: Major > > With Consistent S3, S3Guard is superfluous. > stop developing it and wean people off it as soon as they can. > Then we can worry about what to do in the code. It has gradually insinuated > its way through the layers, especially things like multi-object delete > handling (see HADOOP-17244). Things would be a lot simpler without it -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org