bolerio commented on a change in pull request #2887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2887#discussion_r644283148



##########
File path: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/router/NamenodeHeartbeatService.java
##########
@@ -170,7 +172,20 @@ protected void serviceInit(Configuration configuration) 
throws Exception {
 
   @Override
   public void periodicInvoke() {
-    updateState();
+    try {
+      SecurityUtil.doAsCurrentUser(
+          new PrivilegedExceptionAction<Object>() {
+            @Override
+            public Object run() {
+              updateState();
+              return null;
+            }
+          });
+    } catch (IOException e) {
+      // Generic error that we don't know about
+      LOG.error("Unexpected exception while communicating with {}: {}",

Review comment:
       Hi @goiri , following up this. I was able to create a unit test that 
reproduces the problem and demonstrate that the patch fixes it. However, there 
is a challenge. 
   
   The failure is when the router calls the JMX endpoint which returns some 
info stats in addition to the basic alive status which is obtained in a 
separate RPC call. The failure is soft - logs the exception and continues, 
without the information it tried to obtain. However that information is needed 
later during load balancing, which is how the original bug was discovered. 
   
   Now, because the main interface capturing knowledge about a NN on the router 
side (FederationNamenodeContext) does not contain these stats, there is no way 
to write a unit test against it. There are some unit tests in that area that 
mock this interface and I modified the mock to include stats, but then I have 
to downcast to the mock object in the test which is very ugly. 
   
   So the options are: (1) accept this ugly downcast (2) don't write the test 
and eventually if Hadoop has an integration test suite, cover the use case 
there and (3) modify the FederationNamenodeContext to include the stats (see 
MembershipState and MembershipStats class). My vote would be for (3) as those 
stats seem essential to the operation of a federated cluster. It would be ok 
not to make all of the numbers part of the public interface, but the fact that 
we need stats about resource utilization should be part of the interface.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to