[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17691893#comment-17691893
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-18631:
-----------------------------------------
Apache9 commented on code in PR #5418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5418#discussion_r1113776679
##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/common/MetricsLoggerTask.java:
##########
@@ -115,8 +111,11 @@ private String trimLine(String valueStr) {
.substring(0, maxLogLineLength) + "...");
}
- private static boolean hasAppenders(org.apache.log4j.Logger logger) {
- return logger.getAllAppenders().hasMoreElements();
+ // TODO : hadoop-logging module to hide log4j implementation details, this
method
+ // can directly call utility from hadoop-logging.
+ private static boolean hasAppenders(Logger logger) {
Review Comment:
OK.
> Migrate Async appenders to log4j properties
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-18631
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18631
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Viraj Jasani
> Assignee: Viraj Jasani
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Before we can upgrade to log4j2, we need to migrate async appenders that we
> add "dynamically in the code" to the log4j.properties file. Instead of using
> core/hdfs site configs, log4j properties or system properties should be used
> to determine if the given logger should use async appender.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
