[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17703992#comment-17703992
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-18012:
-----------------------------------------

anmolanmol1234 commented on code in PR #5488:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5488#discussion_r1145873654


##########
hadoop-tools/hadoop-azure/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/azurebfs/services/AbfsClient.java:
##########
@@ -105,14 +108,18 @@ public class AbfsClient implements Closeable {
 
   private final ListeningScheduledExecutorService executorService;
 
-  /** logging the rename failure if metadata is in an incomplete state. */
+  private boolean renameResilience;
+
+  /**
+   * logging the rename failure if metadata is in an incomplete state.
+   */
   private static final LogExactlyOnce ABFS_METADATA_INCOMPLETE_RENAME_FAILURE =
-      new LogExactlyOnce(LOG);
+          new LogExactlyOnce(LOG);
 
   private AbfsClient(final URL baseUrl, final SharedKeyCredentials 
sharedKeyCredentials,
-                    final AbfsConfiguration abfsConfiguration,
-                    final AbfsClientContext abfsClientContext)
-      throws IOException {
+                     final AbfsConfiguration abfsConfiguration,

Review Comment:
   These spaces will make backporting difficult





> ABFS: Enable config controlled ETag check for Rename idempotency
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-18012
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18012
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/azure
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.2
>            Reporter: Sneha Vijayarajan
>            Assignee: Sree Bhattacharyya
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> ABFS driver has a handling for rename idempotency which relies on LMT of the 
> destination file to conclude if the rename was successful or not when source 
> file is absent and if the rename request had entered retry loop.
> This handling is incorrect as LMT of the destination does not change on 
> rename. 
> This Jira will track the change to undo the current implementation and add a 
> new one where for an incoming rename operation, source file eTag is fetched 
> first and then rename is done only if eTag matches for the source file.
> As this is going to be a costly operation given an extra HEAD request is 
> added to each rename, this implementation will be guarded over a config and 
> can enabled by customers who have workloads that do multiple renames. 
> Long term plan to handle rename idempotency without HEAD request is being 
> discussed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to