[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17704200#comment-17704200 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-18012: ----------------------------------------- saxenapranav commented on code in PR #5488: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5488#discussion_r1146354304 ########## hadoop-tools/hadoop-azure/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/azurebfs/services/TestAbfsRenameRetryRecovery.java: ########## @@ -119,8 +156,383 @@ public void testRenameFailuresDueToIncompleteMetadata() throws Exception { // Verify renamePath occurred two times implying a retry was attempted. verify(mockClient, times(2)) - .renamePath(sourcePath, destNoParentPath, null, null, null, false); + .renamePath(sourcePath, destNoParentPath, null, null, null, false, isNamespaceEnabled); + + } + + AbfsClient getMockAbfsClient() throws IOException { + AzureBlobFileSystem fs = getFileSystem(); + + // adding mock objects to current AbfsClient + AbfsClient spyClient = Mockito.spy(fs.getAbfsStore().getClient()); + + Mockito.doAnswer(answer -> { + AbfsRestOperation op = new AbfsRestOperation(AbfsRestOperationType.RenamePath, + spyClient, HTTP_METHOD_PUT, answer.getArgument(0), answer.getArgument(1)); + AbfsRestOperation spiedOp = Mockito.spy(op); + addSpyBehavior(spiedOp, op, spyClient); + return spiedOp; + }).when(spyClient).createRenameRestOperation(nullable(URL.class), nullable(List.class)); Review Comment: +1 @anmolanmol1234 @sreeb-msft any reason why there is nullable, hope header-list and url to the method would always be non-null. > ABFS: Enable config controlled ETag check for Rename idempotency > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-18012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: fs/azure > Affects Versions: 3.3.2 > Reporter: Sneha Vijayarajan > Assignee: Sree Bhattacharyya > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > > ABFS driver has a handling for rename idempotency which relies on LMT of the > destination file to conclude if the rename was successful or not when source > file is absent and if the rename request had entered retry loop. > This handling is incorrect as LMT of the destination does not change on > rename. > This Jira will track the change to undo the current implementation and add a > new one where for an incoming rename operation, source file eTag is fetched > first and then rename is done only if eTag matches for the source file. > As this is going to be a costly operation given an extra HEAD request is > added to each rename, this implementation will be guarded over a config and > can enabled by customers who have workloads that do multiple renames. > Long term plan to handle rename idempotency without HEAD request is being > discussed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org