[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17774901#comment-17774901
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-18487:
-----------------------------------------
steveloughran opened a new pull request, #6184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6184
this is #4996 on branch-3.3
------
Protobuf 2.5 JAR is no longer needed at runtime.
The option common.protobuf.scope defines whether the protobuf 2.5.0
dependency is marked as provided or not.
* New package org.apache.hadoop.ipc.internal for internal only protobuf
classes ...with a ShadedProtobufHelper in there which has shaded protobuf refs
only, so guaranteed not to need protobuf-2.5 on the CP
* All uses of org.apache.hadoop.ipc.ProtobufHelper have been replaced by
uses of org.apache.hadoop.ipc.internal.ShadedProtobufHelper
* The scope of protobuf-2.5 is set by the option common.protobuf2.scope In
this patch is it is still "compile"
* There is explicit reference to it in modules where it may be needed.
* The maven scope of the dependency can be set with the
common.protobuf2.scope option. It can be set to "provided" in a build:
-Dcommon.protobuf2.scope=provided
* Add new ipc(callable) method to catch and convert shaded protobuf
exceptions raised during invocation of the supplied lambda expression
* This is adopted in the code where the migration is not traumatically
over-complex. RouterAdminProtocolTranslatorPB is left alone for this reason.
Contributed by Steve Loughran
<!--
Thanks for sending a pull request!
1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g.,
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
-->
### Description of PR
### How was this patch tested?
### For code changes:
- [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
- [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`,
`NOTICE-binary` files?
> protobuf-2.5.0 dependencies => provided
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-18487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18487
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build, ipc
> Affects Versions: 3.3.4
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> uses of protobuf 2.5 and RpcEnginej have been deprecated since 3.3.0 in
> HADOOP-17046
> while still keeping those files around (for a long time...), how about we
> make the protobuf 2.5.0 export off hadoop common and hadoop-hdfs *provided*,
> rather than *compile*
> that way, if apps want it for their own apis, they have to explicitly ask for
> it, but at least our own scans don't break.
> i have no idea what will happen to the rest of the stack at this point, it
> will be "interesting" to see
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
