[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782689#comment-17782689
 ] 

Agnes Tevesz commented on HADOOP-17377:
---------------------------------------

[~ste...@apache.org] [~brandonvin] Can you help to move this change forward? 
Who should be the owner of this task? The ticket is not assigned to anyone and 
there is no activity on the change since end of August. This fix should land in 
hadoop. The pod identity in azure was deprecated: 
[https://github.com/Azure/aad-pod-identity] If we get the token directly from 
the instance metadata service we hit this HTTP 429 issue with tpcds tests very 
frequently: [https://azure.github.io/azure-workload-identity/docs/] The pod 
identity component most likely provided the retry logic before, but we cannot 
install depreciated components on an AKS cluster. Can this change get finished?

> ABFS: MsiTokenProvider doesn't retry HTTP 429 from the Instance Metadata 
> Service
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-17377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17377
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fs/azure
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>            Reporter: Brandon
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *Summary*
>  The instance metadata service has its own guidance for error handling and 
> retry which are different from the Blob store. 
> [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/managed-identities-azure-resources/how-to-use-vm-token#error-handling]
> In particular, it responds with HTTP 429 if request rate is too high. Whereas 
> Blob store will respond with HTTP 503. The retry policy used only accounts 
> for the latter as it will retry any status >=500. This can result in job 
> instability when running multiple processes on the same host.
> *Environment*
>  * Spark talking to an ABFS store
>  * Hadoop 3.2.1
>  * Running on an Azure VM with user-assigned identity, ABFS configured to use 
> MsiTokenProvider
>  * 6 executor processes on each VM
> *Example*
>  Here's an example error message and stack trace. It's always the same stack 
> trace. This appears in logs a few hundred to low thousands of times a day. 
> It's luckily skating by since the download operation is wrapped in 3 retries.
> {noformat}
> AADToken: HTTP connection failed for getting token from AzureAD. Http 
> response: 429 null
> Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Content-Length: 90 Request ID:  
> Proxies: none
> First 1K of Body: {"error":"invalid_request","error_description":"Temporarily 
> throttled, too many requests"}
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.services.AbfsRestOperation.executeHttpOperation(AbfsRestOperation.java:190)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.services.AbfsRestOperation.execute(AbfsRestOperation.java:125)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.services.AbfsClient.getAclStatus(AbfsClient.java:506)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.services.AbfsClient.getAclStatus(AbfsClient.java:489)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.AzureBlobFileSystemStore.getIsNamespaceEnabled(AzureBlobFileSystemStore.java:208)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.AzureBlobFileSystemStore.getFileStatus(AzureBlobFileSystemStore.java:473)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.AzureBlobFileSystem.getFileStatus(AzureBlobFileSystem.java:437)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.isFile(FileSystem.java:1717)
>       at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.fetchHcfsFile(Utils.scala:747)
>       at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.doFetchFile(Utils.scala:724)
>       at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.fetchFile(Utils.scala:496)
>       at 
> org.apache.spark.executor.Executor.$anonfun$updateDependencies$7(Executor.scala:812)
>       at 
> org.apache.spark.executor.Executor.$anonfun$updateDependencies$7$adapted(Executor.scala:803)
>       at 
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:792)
>       at 
> scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.$anonfun$foreach$1(HashMap.scala:149)
>       at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable.foreachEntry(HashTable.scala:237)
>       at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable.foreachEntry$(HashTable.scala:230)
>       at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.foreachEntry(HashMap.scala:44)
>       at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.foreach(HashMap.scala:149)
>       at 
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.foreach(TraversableLike.scala:791)
>       at 
> org.apache.spark.executor.Executor.org$apache$spark$executor$Executor$$updateDependencies(Executor.scala:803)
>       at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:375)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748){noformat}
>  CC [~mackrorysd], [~ste...@apache.org]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to