[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaobao Wu updated HADOOP-19109:
--------------------------------
    Component/s:     (was: hdfs-client)

> checkPermission should not ignore original AccessControlException 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-19109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19109
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Xiaobao Wu
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In the environment where the *Ranger-HDFS* plugin is enabled, I look at the 
> log information of *AccessControlException* caused by the *du.* I find that 
> the printed log information is not accurate, because the original 
> AccessControlException is ignored by checkPermission, which is not conducive 
> to judging the real situation of the  AccessControlException . At least part 
> of the original log information should be printed.
> AccessControlException information currently printed:
> {code:java}
> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException):
>  Permission denied: user=test,access=READ_EXECUTE, 
> inode="/warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/test.db/stu/dt=2024-01-17":hive:hadoop:drwxrwx---
>     at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSPermissionChecker.checkPermission(FSPermissionChecker.java:226){code}
>  The original AccessControlException information printed:
> {code:java}
> org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied: 
> user=test,access=READ_EXECUTE, inode="dt=2024-01-17":hive:hadoop:drwxrwx---
>     at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSPermissionChecker.check(FSPermissionChecker.java:400)
>  {code}
> From the comparison results of the above log information, it can be seen that 
> the inode information and the exception stack printed by the log are not 
> accurate.
> Later, the *inode* information prompted by the original 
> AccessControlException log information makes me realize that the Ranger-HDFS 
> plug-in in the current environment is not incorporated into RANGER-2297, so I 
> think it is necessary to prompt this part of the log information.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to