[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17832466#comment-17832466
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-19134:
-----------------------------------------
pjfanning opened a new pull request, #6692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6692
### Description of PR
HADOOP-19134
### How was this patch tested?
### For code changes:
- [x] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
- [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`,
`NOTICE-binary` files?
> use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-19134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19134
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: PJ Fanning
> Priority: Major
>
> StringBuilder is basically the same as StringBuffer but doesn't use
> synchronized. String appending rarely needs locking like this.
> There are some public and package private APIs that use StringBuffers as
> input or return types - I have left these alone for compatibility reasons.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
