[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13250144#comment-13250144
 ] 

Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-8152:
----------------------------------------

bq. Even marking something as Public+Evolving has certain implications. I don't 
know if I'm comfortable with some of these being marked public. Will the 
impacted parties understand when we break them?

I'd like to think that the impacted parties would understand. Perhaps one of 
the HBase folk watching this JIRA could comment? Andrew? Todd?

bq. (It is inevitable we're going to change reloginFromKeytab and likely even 
remove it as part of reworking UGI.)

Is it also inevitable that maintaining backward compatibility will be 
impossible? If it is, then we can still break them. Hence the "Evolving" 
annotation.

Also, could you point me toward the JIRA discussing reworking UGI? I'm not 
familiar with it.
                
> Expand public APIs for security library classes
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-8152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>         Attachments: HADOOP-8152.patch, HADOOP-8152.patch
>
>
> Currently projects like Hive and HBase use UserGroupInformation and 
> SecurityUtil methods. Both of these classes are marked 
> LimitedPrivate(HDFS,MR) but should probably be marked more generally public.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to