steveloughran opened a new pull request, #6789: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6789
Initial design * no tests or docs * served up via StoreContext. Not sure about the merits of that I think it is needed so it gets down to all AbstractStoreOperation instances, but should that be where the decision is made? * create performance is wired up. * as is path capabilities For testing we need to make sure ths is unset from all cost tests. relates to #6543; the logic to set up that operation is here...that PR would just be the implementation. Same for a delete optimisation where we'd skip parent dir probe. rename could do the same for its source dir too. ### For code changes: - [X] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')? - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation? - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, `NOTICE-binary` files? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
