[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13565623#comment-13565623
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-9258:
----------------------------------------
Tom the S3 failures are bugs there, the rename one being more serious, as it
will lose data (after the rename, the parent dir is deleted).
I don't know enough about the code there to fix fast -can you do it?. FWIW, the
swift:// test for child-ness was trivial:
{code}
public static boolean isChildOf(SwiftObjectPath parent,
SwiftObjectPath possibleChild) {
return possibleChild.getObject().startsWith(parent.getObject() + "/");
}
{code}
I'm not going to do Local FS test with this once this is in I plan to write
some Junit4 tests alongside this contract to be even more rigorous.
> Add stricter tests to FileSystemContractTestBase
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-9258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: test
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 2.0.3-alpha
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Attachments: HADOOP-9528-2.patch, HADOOP-9528.patch
>
>
> The File System Contract contains implicit assumptions that aren't checked in
> the contract test base. Add more tests to define the contract's assumptions
> more rigorously for those filesystems that are tested by this (not Local, BTW)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
