[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567682#comment-13567682
]
Tom White commented on HADOOP-8545:
-----------------------------------
I wonder whether this would be better hosted outside Hadoop Common, since it's
an optional feature, and won't get tested against Swift during routine Hadoop
development. We recommended this course of action for KFS when it became QFS
recently:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201210.mbox/%3ccc946699.1c97b%25thi...@quantcast.com%3E
It's a non-trivial amount of code: it adds over 35 Java classes in 9 packages
to core. Does it add any new dependencies? I tried compiling and it complained
about not being able to find org.apache.http.HttpHeaders.
It looks like the native implementation supports large files now. If so, then
the block store implementation is redundant and can be removed.
> Filesystem Implementation for OpenStack Swift
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-8545
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha, 1.1.2
> Reporter: Tim Miller
> Assignee: Dmitry Mezhensky
> Attachments: HADOOP-8545-1.patch, HADOOP-8545-2.patch,
> HADOOP-8545-3.patch, HADOOP-8545-4.patch, HADOOP-8545-5.patch,
> HADOOP-8545-6.patch, HADOOP-8545-javaclouds-2.patch, HADOOP-8545.patch,
> HADOOP-8545.patch
>
>
> Add a filesystem implementation for OpenStack Swift object store, similar to
> the one which exists today for S3.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
