[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13628208#comment-13628208 ]
Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HADOOP-9468: ---------------------------------------------- looks reasonable to me. have you tested on RHEL5? > JVM path embedded in fuse binaries > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-9468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9468 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sean Mackrory > Assignee: Sean Mackrory > Attachments: > 0001-HADOOP-9468.-Not-embedding-JVM-library-paths-in-FUSE.patch > > > When the FUSE binaries are built, the paths to libraries in the JVMs is > embedded in the RPATH so that they can be found at run-time. From an Apache > Bigtop perspective, this is not sufficient because the software may be run on > a machine configured very differently from the one on which they were built - > so a wrapper sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH according to JAVA_HOME. I recently saw an > issue where the original JVM path existed, causing LD_LIBRARY_PATH to be > ignored in favor of the RPATH, but it was not the JVM intended for running > Hadoop (not JAVA_HOME), and this caused problems. > I'm told that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH is standard practice before using the > fuse program anyway, and if that's the case, I think removing the RPATH from > the binaries is a good idea. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira