[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13742207#comment-13742207
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-9865:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1493 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/1493/])
HADOOP-9865.  FileContext#globStatus has a regression with respect to relative 
path.  (Contributed by Chaun Lin) (cmccabe: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1514531)
* /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/CHANGES.txt
* 
/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Globber.java
* 
/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestGlobPaths.java

                
> FileContext.globStatus() has a regression with respect to relative path
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9865
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9865
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Chuan Liu
>            Assignee: Chuan Liu
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9865-demo.patch, HADOOP-9865-trunk.2.patch, 
> HADOOP-9865-trunk.3.patch, HADOOP-9865-trunk.patch
>
>
> I discovered the problem when running unit test TestMRJobClient on Windows. 
> The cause is indirect in this case. In the unit test, we try to launch a job 
> and list its status. The job failed, and caused the list command get a result 
> of 0, which triggered the unit test assert. From the log and debug, the job 
> failed because we failed to create the Jar with classpath (see code around 
> {{FileUtil.createJarWithClassPath}}) in {{ContainerLaunch}}. This is a 
> Windows specific step right now; so the test still passes on Linux. This step 
> failed because we passed in a relative path to {{FileContext.globStatus()}} 
> in {{FileUtil.createJarWithClassPath}}. The relevant log looks like the 
> following.
> {noformat}
> 2013-08-12 16:12:05,937 WARN  [ContainersLauncher #0] 
> launcher.ContainerLaunch (ContainerLaunch.java:call(270)) - Failed to launch 
> container.
> org.apache.hadoop.HadoopIllegalArgumentException: Path is relative
>       at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.checkNotRelative(Path.java:74)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileContext.getFSofPath(FileContext.java:304)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Globber.schemeFromPath(Globber.java:107)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Globber.glob(Globber.java:128)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileContext$Util.globStatus(FileContext.java:1908)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createJarWithClassPath(FileUtil.java:1247)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.launcher.ContainerLaunch.sanitizeEnv(ContainerLaunch.java:679)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.launcher.ContainerLaunch.call(ContainerLaunch.java:232)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.launcher.ContainerLaunch.call(ContainerLaunch.java:1)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> {noformat}
> I think this is a regression from HADOOP-9817. I modified some code and the 
> unit test passed. (See the attached patch.) However, I think the impact is 
> larger. I will add some unit tests to verify the behavior, and work on a more 
> complete fix.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to